<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grandpa Gets All the Calls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/</link>
	<description>Stats, stories and stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Turkenkopf</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Turkenkopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealingfirst.com/?p=40#comment-51</guid>
		<description>You think you've got it bad,  I'm just an IT consultant.  

So I've got the programming piece of this down, but I definitely struggle with the analysis.  

If only I remembered my stats classes better from college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think you&#8217;ve got it bad,  I&#8217;m just an IT consultant.  </p>
<p>So I&#8217;ve got the programming piece of this down, but I definitely struggle with the analysis.  </p>
<p>If only I remembered my stats classes better from college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excalabur</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Excalabur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealingfirst.com/?p=40#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Enh, needs.  This stuff is interesting, and I appreciate that people with time to do it do so.  I'm a physicist, so I can comment intelligently, but don't have time to do my own baseball research.

In ten years or so you could do all kinds of fun stuff with a multivariate regression on age, year, and so on.  However, we of course don't want to wait that long.  

Have fun fixing the selection bias issue, though I believe there are well-known ways to do this (I'm a physicist, so I don't know 'em, we just measure stuff).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enh, needs.  This stuff is interesting, and I appreciate that people with time to do it do so.  I&#8217;m a physicist, so I can comment intelligently, but don&#8217;t have time to do my own baseball research.</p>
<p>In ten years or so you could do all kinds of fun stuff with a multivariate regression on age, year, and so on.  However, we of course don&#8217;t want to wait that long.  </p>
<p>Have fun fixing the selection bias issue, though I believe there are well-known ways to do this (I&#8217;m a physicist, so I don&#8217;t know &#8216;em, we just measure stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Turkenkopf</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Turkenkopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealingfirst.com/?p=40#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I'll try and take a look at it by year and see what a regression shows.

I'm planning on including some graphs for the full version of the article, so hopefully that will meet your needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ll try and take a look at it by year and see what a regression shows.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning on including some graphs for the full version of the article, so hopefully that will meet your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Excalabur</title>
		<link>http://blog.stealingfirst.com/2008/04/10/grandpa-gets-all-the-calls/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Excalabur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stealingfirst.com/?p=40#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I'd think you'd be better off doing a straight-up binning into one-year bins and then doing a weighted linear regression: there's enough pitchers in the bigs this shouldn't get you too killed.  

You'd have to weight for number of pitches to avoid the really old guys having too much influence: probably assuming poissionian error would be your best bet.  

I'm also a big fan of graphs for things like this to see if there's any obvious shape.  

And yes, of course your selection bias is a big problem: in 10 years you can just look at the same pitchers over time, but that's not an option yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d think you&#8217;d be better off doing a straight-up binning into one-year bins and then doing a weighted linear regression: there&#8217;s enough pitchers in the bigs this shouldn&#8217;t get you too killed.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;d have to weight for number of pitches to avoid the really old guys having too much influence: probably assuming poissionian error would be your best bet.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also a big fan of graphs for things like this to see if there&#8217;s any obvious shape.  </p>
<p>And yes, of course your selection bias is a big problem: in 10 years you can just look at the same pitchers over time, but that&#8217;s not an option yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.591 seconds -->
